UK energy market reform: CMA’s final proposals | Practical Law

UK energy market reform: CMA’s final proposals | Practical Law

The Competition and Markets Authority’s final report on its energy market investigation, which was published on 24 June 2016, has drawn mixed reactions. It is clear that businesses will need to evaluate carefully the impact of the CMA’s proposals across their organisations and consider proactively how best to comply with the forthcoming changes to the technical and regulatory architecture.

UK energy market reform: CMA’s final proposals

Practical Law UK Articles 6-631-2525 (Approx. 4 pages)

UK energy market reform: CMA’s final proposals

by James Marshall and Sonja Hainsworth, Berwin Leighton Paisner LLP
Published on 28 Jul 2016United Kingdom
The Competition and Markets Authority’s final report on its energy market investigation, which was published on 24 June 2016, has drawn mixed reactions. It is clear that businesses will need to evaluate carefully the impact of the CMA’s proposals across their organisations and consider proactively how best to comply with the forthcoming changes to the technical and regulatory architecture.
The Competition and Markets Authority’s (CMA) final report on its energy market investigation, which was published on 24 June 2016, has drawn mixed reactions. The report is the culmination of a two-year review into the supply and acquisition of gas and electricity in the UK retail and wholesale markets, and follows the CMA’s provisional decision on remedies published on 10 March 2016 (see box "Aims of the remedies package").
Despite facing widespread criticism that the provisional recommendations did not go far enough to address competition concerns, the CMA has not made any substantive amendments to the remedies it initially proposed. Indeed, the outcome has been challenged for being insufficiently hard-hitting, with one of the CMA’s panellists, Martin Cave, publicly dissenting from the recommendations. Conversely, others have argued that it has gone too far.
Irrespective of the divided views on the final report, it is clear that businesses will need to evaluate carefully the impact of the CMA’s proposals across their organisations and consider proactively how best to comply with the forthcoming changes to the technical and regulatory architecture intended to "modernise the market and ensure it works in consumers’ interests".

Remedies package

The CMA identified three broad categories of remedies:
  • Retail market remedies that are aimed at easing customer switching and protecting low-income consumers on prepayment and restricted meters.
  • Wholesale market remedies to increase the rigour of non-auction awards of renewables contracts for difference (CFDs) and introduce cost-reflective transmission loss pricing.
  • Regulatory remedies to recalibrate the roles of the Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC), Ofgem and the energy industry. Ofgem’s duties will be clarified, and the so-called "big six" energy suppliers will face additional financial and performance reporting.

Retail market remedies

The CMA’s remedies are intended to make it easier for consumers and micro-businesses to switch to more competitively priced energy tariffs. According to the CMA, approximately 70% of domestic customers of the "big six" are on the most expensive default standard variable tariff (SVT). In particular, the CMA’s analysis revealed that, in total, customers may have been paying an estimated £1.4 billion a year more than they would in a competitive market.
In its provisional findings, published on 7 July 2015, the CMA identified a range of concerns that impede competition in the retail market, including widespread consumer disengagement, regulatory inadequacies and a need for greater transparency. In particular, the CMA cited the following as creating an adverse effect on competition: a lack of awareness of what deals are available; confusing and inaccurate bills; and the real and perceived difficulties of changing suppliers.
The CMA therefore proposed a suite of measures to address its concerns, including:
  • The creation of an Ofgem-controlled database of disengaged domestic and micro-business customers that have been on an SVT for more than three years. This would allow competitors to target these customers more easily.
  • The abandonment of the four-tariff rule introduced by Ofgem following its retail market review in 2013.
  • A temporary safeguard price control to remain in place until 2020 for prepayment meter customers, which would reduce bills by a total of £300 million each year. The price cap will not apply to customers with the next generation of smart meter (SMETS 2).
  • Making it easier for new suppliers to compete for prepayment customers and for those customers to switch suppliers, even if they are in debt.

Wholesale market remedies

In the wholesale sector, the CMA’s provisional findings identified two areas in which competition in the wholesale market does not operate effectively:
  • The mechanisms for allocating CFDs.
  • The absence of locational charging for transmission losses.
For CFDs, the CMA recommends that DECC undertakes and consults on a clear and rigorous impact assessment before either awarding a CFD outside of the competitive auction process or before allocating technologies to particular pots (that is, to the portion of funding available within a particular auction) and the CFD budget to those different pots.
For transmission losses, the CMA suggests introducing locational charging to improve the accuracy with which the avoidable costs of variable transmission losses are borne by those that cause them. The CMA intends to implement the remedy by imposing a requirement on National Grid, as system operator, to calculate imbalance charges taking into account transmission losses calculated on the basis of location.

Regulatory governance remedies

The CMA’s remedies package also includes a reset to clarify and recalibrate the relationship between DECC, Ofgem and the industry. The proposals concern five areas: Ofgem’s duties and responsibilities; the relationship between DECC and Ofgem; the analysis of the effects of policy and regulation; the regime for financial reporting; and governance of the industry codes.
To address these concerns, the CMA recommends:
  • The introduction of new legislation to clarify Ofgem’s statutory objectives and duties.
  • Increased consultation by DECC on policy decisions.
  • Requiring Ofgem to modify the licence conditions of the "big six" energy firms so they have to provide separate financial reports for their generation and retail supply activities.
  • Giving Ofgem a more proactive role in code development, including the power to modify industry codes in certain exceptional circumstances.

Impact on consumers and businesses

Whether or not the CMA’s remedies sufficiently address the problems hindering competition is up for debate. While some commentators have suggested that the retail remedies package does not go far enough, others have suggested it is, in some respects, a step too far.
It is arguable that the protection afforded by the temporary price cap should be extended to benefit all SVT customers, not just those with prepayment meters. This view was expressed at the end of the CMA’s report in Martin Cave’s statement of dissent, noting that a short-term price cap covering a substantially larger number of customers would be required to reset the market. Indeed, it is possible that the price cap may lead to suppliers targeting prepayment customers with the new SMETS 2 meters in order to circumvent the price cap. Similarly, taking on the new SMETS 2 meters may be less palatable to prepayment customers in case they lose the benefit of the price cap.
The CMA has also introduced an additional regulatory burden. While the CMA’s intentions behind the proposal to develop a database of disengaged customers are admirable, they also increase the onus on both Ofgem and suppliers to ensure compliance with data protection legislation.

Implementation timetable

On 11 July 2016, the CMA published an implementation timetable for the remedies set out in the final report (https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/578366d7e5274a0da3000152/energy-remedies-case-timetable.pdf).
The timetable involves a combination of orders, undertakings from companies and recommendations to DECC and Ofgem. The remedies must be implemented by 23 December 2016. The CMA will consult on the pre-payment meter price cap and locational losses orders in August 2016, and will consult on all the other orders in September 2016. The CMA also intends to consult formally on all orders and undertakings in October 2016.
James Marshall is a partner, and Sonja Hainsworth is an associate, at Berwin Leighton Paisner LLP.

Aims of the remedies package

The Competition and Markets Authority’s remedies package includes more than 30 measures designed to achieve four overarching aims:
  • Create a framework for effective competition.
  • Help customers to engage.
  • Protect those unable to exploit the benefits of competition.
  • Future-proof remedies by building a robust regulatory framework.