Supreme Court adjourns appeal so government can address them on whether old costs regime infringed ECHR | Practical Law

Supreme Court adjourns appeal so government can address them on whether old costs regime infringed ECHR | Practical Law

In Coventry and others v Lawrence and another (No 2) [2014] UKSC 46, the court considered a number of issues, including whether the costs regime in place before 1 April 2013 infringed Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights.

Supreme Court adjourns appeal so government can address them on whether old costs regime infringed ECHR

Practical Law UK Legal Update Case Report 6-575-6429 (Approx. 3 pages)

Supreme Court adjourns appeal so government can address them on whether old costs regime infringed ECHR

Published on 23 Jul 2014England, Wales
In Coventry and others v Lawrence and another (No 2) [2014] UKSC 46, the court considered a number of issues, including whether the costs regime in place before 1 April 2013 infringed Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights.
NOTE: On 22 July 2015, the Supreme Court held, by a majority of 5:2, that the costs regime introduced by the Access to Justice Act 1999 regime and, in particular, a claimant's right to recover any success fee and After the Event premium from an unsuccessful defendant, did not infringe either Article 6 or Article 1 of the First Protocol to the European Convention on Human Rights.